BACKGROUND

	Sign In Sign-Up

This web-site is dedicated to the memory of the niece of our founder; a fine young lady who was caused to take her own life because of her father's, and his clan's, cruel attitude to her needs. Read about the circumstances that lead to the tragic loss of that life. Consider that it was all because of GREED. Precisely what our legal system serves for the operatives through ILL legal services care of our legal experts and the modus operandi from within. (access .../summons.html)

SIX months before taking her own life that fine young lady proclaimed to our founder :- "I can't understand it uncle everyone thinks of bricks mortar and money NO ONE CARES ABOUT PEOPLE".

All underlined text with an asterisk indicates a LINK at the bottom of the page

Andrew is a British citizen of colonial extraction; born in Nicosia Cyprus; educated at the English School Nicosia. Throughout his secondary education he learned of, admired and respected the much publicised and proclaimed virtues of the British Democratic System and the world famous attributes of British Fair Play. Such teachings and practices were part of school life; particularly in the numerous sports activities where one was taught to be a fair sport and a true Brit., never to kick someone when down and or hit below the belt. But those were the teachings, the proclamations and the practices in a colonial environment. Not so life in the U.K.

Since 1956 Andrew has lived in London. Over that span of time he has observed and lived through a gradual deterioration of morals and civility in the United Kingdom; all is beyond recognition with no respect for family let alone neighbour or other citizens. Not that life in London ever matched the civilities and manners instilled in Andrew through his upbringing and his social and spiritual background; also through the teachings at a fine educational establishment. Over 43 years of life in London, a city that has gradually become a true European cosmopolis, Andrew can state that only on one single instance the Law Enforcement Agencies truly applied themselves to the law as the law provides without bias, favouritism and or prejudice and discrimination. On that single instance the detective constable, who was assigned to the case, was of Afro-Caribbean origins and the criminal was of Far Eastern origins. On every other occasion and instance the police defaulted to act and/or to exercise their public duties as the law provided. The events depicted in "The Breeding Grounds - case*" can safely be treated as a typical example of the practices and the failings of both Law Enforcement Agencies. The operations of the system have gradually been demoralising the country and its population; the citizens reverting a ones proud respected and much admired nation into free individuals with no respect for any law, society and or any other but one's self; leading to and creating new jungle rules because the person with no respect for any law and or any other citizens is protected while the victims are scorned and abandoned by a great nation and a self proclaimed democratic modern civilisation. In a true Democracy, however, the freedoms of the individual should not be through impositions and or the deprivation of the rights of other citizens.

The public at large can draw its own conclusions as to 'the system' and the operations of the Law Enforcement Agencies maintained by the United Kingdom. When individuals, who know of and are charged to apply the law, flagrantly breach it in order to offer protection to others who have themselves breached national laws (of which they are and should be fully aware) why should the ordinary citizen himself act any different? When ministers in charge of the police and the Judiciary are 'conveniently protected' by their subordinates, because they elect to cover up complaints directed at and raised with the Ministers themselves, through suppression of the facts and or through incompetent responses* the final question is "WHO governs ? And How ?"

Read "The Breeding Grounds - case*"; download and print it, if you wish to use it as a C.A.P case. In that case because the police failed to take the necessary steps, called for from the onset, THEY SIMPLY promoted and encouraged crime. Through their defaults they ALSO simply promoted and encouraged the problems and AS always INTENDED the services of the legal circles to which one and ALL have close affinity. The first young constable ignored the victim and in true Metropolitan Police practice HE simply wished to generate work and income for solicitors'*; a very common direction by public servants.* The young constable determined that threats to property and life, violence, blackmail and intimidation were just civil matters. In ordering the victim to spend funds with solicitors the constable just exhibited the malaise from within the LAW enforcement agencies. In the UK the law exists ONLY WHEN YOU CAN AFFORD TO BUY your rights, unless some other can outbid you through the manipulations of the legal system the operatives from within offer to the highest bidder. The UK is, after all, an alleged Democracy where CAPITAL and money ARE THE ONLY COMMODITIES that count. Humans are simply vehicles to be used by manipulative public servants and the dishonest and the criminally orientated and or motivated. Those who ARE ENCOURAGED by the state and public servants, especially from within the Law Enforcement Agencies, to feel free and to act as they please, at the expense of others.

Read the letter from an illiterate* in English, in law and in court practice, member of staff from within the Lord Chancellor's department. Draw your own conclusions. WHO, from within the United Kingdom, care to apply themselves to the Laws of Parliament? Consider carefully the CoA ruling and our comments in respect of 'The Downing Street Years'*. That august body, through blatant defaults to consider the law applicable in the case before them, elected instead to OFFER the usual service to the circles from within which they arose to public (judicial - most certainly but not judicious) office. Nothing but the usual from within the confines of UK courts. Denial of rights in law to THE CITIZENS and promotion of the cancerous growth industry (legal services) care of the merchants of misery (lawyers).

Copyright subsists on all material on our web-site, owned by the authors of same.